Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Indicators Relevant to COVID Response

Below is a selection of health indicators that Clackamas County residents are most vulnerable to, increasing risk of COVID-19 and it's secondary effects.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Clackamas

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Clackamas

7.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Clackamas has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clackamas has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OR Value (11.9%), Clackamas has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
OR Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Clackamas has a value of 7.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clackamas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Clackamas

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Clackamas

53.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Clackamas has a value of 53.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 46.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 51.6%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clackamas has a value of 53.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OR Value (50.9%), Clackamas has a value of 53.1% which is higher and worse.
OR Value
(50.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Clackamas has a value of 53.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clackamas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing County: Clackamas

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing County: Clackamas

31.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clackamas has a value of 31.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OR Value (31.8%), Clackamas has a value of 31.6% which is lower and better.
OR Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Clackamas has a value of 31.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clackamas (31.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.1%).
Prior Value
(31.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clackamas value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Projected Food Insecurity Rate County: Clackamas

Current Value:

Projected Food Insecurity Rate County: Clackamas

9.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Clackamas has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clackamas has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OR Value (12.3%), Clackamas has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.
OR Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clackamas (9.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.1%).
Prior Value
(14.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force County: Clackamas

Current Value:

Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force County: Clackamas

4.4%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Clackamas has a value of 4.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.2%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clackamas has a value of 4.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OR Value (4.9%), Clackamas has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
OR Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.1%), Clackamas has a value of 4.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clackamas (4.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.6%).
Prior Value
(3.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clackamas value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Households without a Vehicle

Value
Compared to:

Households without a Vehicle

Value
Compared to:

Households without a Vehicle County: Clackamas

Current Value:

Households without a Vehicle County: Clackamas

4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OR Counties, Clackamas has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.6%.
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clackamas has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OR Value (7.0%), Clackamas has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
OR Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Clackamas has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clackamas value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.